Stone Canyon Creek, Restoration Activities, UCLA
34 Comments so far
Leave a comment
May 30, 2009, 8:07 pm
Filed under: 11505682, Community Service/Volunteer, Los Angeles, Santa Monica Bay, Spring 2009, Student Projects, UCLA Sustainability | Tags: IOE, Santa Monica Baykeepers, stone caynon creek, volunteer
Filed under: 11505682, Community Service/Volunteer, Los Angeles, Santa Monica Bay, Spring 2009, Student Projects, UCLA Sustainability | Tags: IOE, Santa Monica Baykeepers, stone caynon creek, volunteer
Related Links
Restoration and Community Service,
UCLA’s Natural History : a PDF file that identifies the past and present Nature — Biology and Land use at UCLA.
Santa Monica Baykeepers Organization: Facilitators’ blog of the Stone Canyon Creek restoration project.
Bird of Westwood. See what activities birds are up to in Westwood
Advertisement
34 Comments so far
Leave a comment

When volunteering for the Stone Canyon Creek project on October 18, we primarily removed non-native vegetation from Stone Canyon Creek near the Anderson school (largely physical work). Although the removal of non-natives is the point of the activity, we felt that our experience might have been enhanced had we been prepped before working with a quick tutorial on identifying the natives and non-nonnatives, the historical context of those plants, where Stone Canyon Creek comes from, and why it is important to this ecosystem to remove the invasive, non-native species.
Comment by environment170 October 20, 2008 @ 8:18 pmAs future “activities” for the Stone Canyon Creek project, we propose the following:
- Introduction of project leaders and of project
- Removing exotics: pulling invasive weeds out, cutting down non-native trees
- Picking up trash from, in, or around stream
- Planting of native plants
- Surveying of native flora: This would include taking gps coordinates, dbh, height, canopy size, etc, of the plants. This could be conducted every few months to track the status of the natives as the non-native vegetation was removed.
- Stream survey: take pH of water, test for contaminants, measure flow. Again, this would be a longitudinal study (over time)
- Soil Survey: use existing soil survey as a means of studying the soil and understanding the vegetation that grows there. Again, ph tests, collect soil samples through auguring, etc.
- Fauna survey: what lives in the soil, what lives in the trees, what lives in the water, what needs the native vegetation to survive?
- Participant education – what’s invasive and what’s endemic? How do you identify these plants? Why is it important? What significance have they had historically? Why do the native plants grow there, and why are we removing the non-native plants? Where does Stone Canyon Creek come from? Why do we care about it?
- Lunch – What we eat and how it impacts the environment.
On October 18th, I volunteered with the Santa Monica Baykeepers on the Stone Canyon Creek Restoration Project. Before this experience, I had no idea that UCLA had a creek. It’s nice to know that UCLA is not all concrete. I had an enjoyable time with many others from class helping to remove some of the non-native plants that surrounded the creek. Some of the non-natives included grass and ivy. We had to also remove the roots so that they won’t regrow. The director showed us some of the native plants so that those would not be removed. Some of the tools that were used included weeders, a weed wrench, gardening fork, gloves, burlap sack, etc.
Comment by clarissayu October 26, 2008 @ 3:24 amThe finance aspect of the project includes the cost of the tools and rental of the container to haul away all the plants we dug up. The project is funded by a grant. Overall, I learned to identify some of the native species of plants and why it is important that non-natives be removes. I believe that they will be planting more natives next time. It would be really interesting to see the final results of the restoration project and how it would be upkept in the future. I believe that more people should be aware of this area of the campus and of nature in general. By informing people of native plants, so much resources could be conserved, mainly water since native plants need less water to survive.
On October 18, I volunteered at the Stone Canyon Creek Project run by the Santa Monica Baykeepers. At this event, the primary objective of the day was to remove as much non-native species in close proximity to the creek as possible. Although this entailed simple physical removal of certain plants, I did learn something valuable. This project taught the participants to identify certain non-native versus native species, and also created an awareness among participants that conserving the environment does not just need to take place in distant tropical regions, or polar ice-caps, or even just the Santa Monica Bay, but can be done on the UCLA campus. Although this event was productive and educational, I believe it could be improved by creating a brief presentation on the destructiveness of non-native species to demonstrate the importance of the event and motivate the participants.
Comment by rileyrichardson November 15, 2008 @ 8:58 pmIt is great to participate in this meaningful community service. Even though it was a hard work to take off the root which deep the soil, at the time I took it off I feel fulfillment. Also, during taking off the non-native plant, I found tomatos in ivy; however, I still needed to remove them, because they are not the native species in UCLA stone canyon creek.
Comment by ylin40 December 1, 2008 @ 7:43 pmOn October 18, it was a nice morning that we do the Stone Canyon Creek Project. We were helping an environmental group, who had great knowledge on plants, to do the cleaning up of Stone Canyon Creek. They can identify almost every single plant by the creek, which I really admired. However, I wished that we have had a short workshop before the clean up about what were the native plants and what were not, also of what were the functions of these native plants and non-natives to the creek etc. Because during the clean up I had to consistently ask the nearest director of the clean up team about what was the right plant to remove and what was not, which wasted a lot of unnecessary time during our limited time spent by the creek. I was disappointed that this Stone Canyon Creek project was more of a physical activity than actually learning about the importance and meaning of these plants, which would be some knowledge I could keep for a long time. This is what can be improved for next year’s Stone Canyon Creek clean up.
Comment by serenaliao December 8, 2008 @ 8:19 amI volunteered at Stone Canyon Creek on November 15, and was on the publicity committee for the class. In terms of what we actually did at the creek, I thought this project was very effective. The work we did was very hands on, but throughout the day we could also see that what we were doing was having an actual tangible effect – by the time we left we had cleared the majority of the non native species from the creek area. Also, because it was campus volunteer day, there were students from other organizations present so we could get more done. I would have liked to see how the turnout for this activity was on a day when a campus wide community service day wasn’t being held, because I felt that besides our class the volunteers from the service day were the majority of people there. The representatives from Santa Monica Bay Keepers did a great job of keeping people on task and also giving them information about what the plants were that we were removing and why we needed to remove them, as well as what would happen next. Although it would be more time intensive, I think an interesting project for the class to do would be to participate in this over a period of time so that we could take part in removing the non native species, planting new ones, and even helping maintain the creek as new vegetation grows in. In terms of publicity for the event, I think there definitely could have been more. Because the clean up was organized by the SM Baykeepers, I think that we didn’t know enough about the event to publicize for it. However, now that it is over I think this is something we should try to get environmental and service organizations on campus involved in as a continuing project. Overall, I think the experience was a beneficial one, and I would definitely do it again.
Comment by talipom December 9, 2008 @ 7:17 pmI participated in the Stone Creek Canyon restoration on April 18th and found it to be a rewarding experience. Several students of all ages showed up in support of restoring native vegetation to this beautiful part of campus. The entire day was spent performing manual labor by removing invasive grasses that had overrun the entire area surrounding the creek and hillside. From start to finish, a lot of progress was made by clearing a large patch of land in order to restore native vegetation. It was a little discomforting to hear that the invasive grasses might only take another couple of weeks before they return, but this removal was an important intermediate step for long-term survival of the native vegetation. My participation included removal of non-native grasses using a pitchfork and my bare hands. It was especially rewarding to see how much effort went into the process and the resulting natural landscape that was much more beautiful. Having had some background information from a presentation earlier in the quarter, I was able to understand the process of invasive species removal, however, there were several students that did not have this information and they did not understand why it was so important to restore the native vegetation. It would have been a more beneficial experience if the project leaders had started the day with an introduction of why native vegetation filters pollution, increases animal biodiversity, or promotes a healthier ecosystem. It was strange that this wasn’t the first thing that was addressed because education on these topics helps to spread knowledge of why the environment is so important to our own health and a sustainable future. It is extremely important that organizations like Santa Monica Baykeeper exist, but if there is no education on background information, it is almost as if the effort exerted to restore native vegetation has no meaning behind it. People must understand why weeds are not vital components of a healthy ecosystem and why it is necessary to exert the extra effort to eliminate these weeds. In the future, I would suggest spending time at the beginning identifying native vegetation and non-native vegetation by introducing advantages and disadvantages they pose on the ecosystem. At the end of the cleanup, it would be more rewarding to see how much progress was made if there was an explanation on the importance of the invasive species removal. Overall, it was a gratifying experience to see young and old alike join in an effort to undo damage to the beautiful Stone Canyon Creek by plowing the tough Earth and exerting some sweat so that future generations might enjoy this natural area.
Comment by Robert Lucas April 21, 2009 @ 2:13 amOn April 18th students
Comment by environment170 April 21, 2009 @ 5:30 pmThe Stone Canyon Creek restoration on April 18th 2009 may have appeared to the outside to be a bunch of students pulling weeds, but for The Santa Monica Bay keepers, the “mere” pulling of weeds becomes integral for the restoration of the particular ecosystem. We removed “non-native” vegetation and other invasive plant life that inhibits native plants with deeper roots from thriving around the creek bed. The shallow roots of these plants make their removal a fairly simple endeavor and is one reason why they are not the optimum plant life for holding “together” the surrounding soil and preventing the deterioration of the creek bed.
It was surprising to learn that the grass is so aggressive that if left to its own accord, it would only be three months until our perfectly cleared area would need to be re-weeded. (Fortunately, the summer heat will definitely inhibit the aggressive expansion of the non-native weeds). However, this puts in perspective how much effort and time really goes into a creek restoration and preserving the life of the native plants, especially the “Baby” plants that had been planted during the winter. One of the staff workers had said in the presentation that restorations such as stone canyon can take up to five years.
Although we did not plant any new natives, we did have the opportunity to check on and water some of the more recently installed plants. We were most worried about those plants furthest from the creek and exposed directly to the sun. One of the plants I watered was a small rose bush. The hope with the native plants is that it will draw back some of the native species that had perviously habited the Stone Canyon Creek, as well as be deep rooted and help naturally “hold together” the creek bed.
The weeding itself was not as “simple” as it appeared. The plants, such as the “thistle” with purple flowers and the grass-type weeds, need to be pulled by the root. We did this because we want to make sure that it’s as difficult as possible for it to grow back, which leads to the actual sifting and raking of the “cleared” area. After weeding, there are still roots and debris in the soil that is extracted by overturning the top soil in the whole area.
As said in the lecture presentation, there are very few running waterways in Los Angeles, and it is a treat that we at UCLA have one on our very own campus! It is up to us to take care of it and facilitate the restoration of the waterway to its “natural” formation and ecosystem (even if it means spending two hours dragging logs from the creek bed to a disposal bin :] ).
Kim Sanders
Dozens of people of all ages and representing various entities showed up today to literally pitch in at the Stone Canyon Creek Restoration Day. Prepared with gloves and pitchforks, we went to work removing nonnative species surrounding the creek so that native species could be planted and the ecological niche could be restored to its past condition. Aside from Baykeeper staff, several high school students were there, as well as some UCLA students who came as part of Community Service Day and many Environment 170 students. While some people were a little dismayed that their community service was manual labor as opposed to some instantly gratifying activity, I think on the whole people enjoyed the day and contributed to the air of cooperation and amiability.
There is definitely something to be said for getting your hands (and shoes, clothes, face) dirty; I think the whole day was somewhat therapeutic—getting a good workout with fresh air and not in a sterile gym, the sense of accomplishment when one part of the hillside went from covered in vines to virtually no roots in a matter of hours, the aromatherapy of freshly turned soil, the camaraderie and teamwork shared among people who just met but share a passion for the environment, and the feeling of breaking a sweat for a good cause. My arms may be sore tomorrow from carrying burlap full of discarded vines and roots and my shoes may be caked in mud for weeks, but it was a great day and a great experience!
Comment by environment170 April 21, 2009 @ 5:32 pmSanta Monica Baykeeper is an organization dedicated to the preservation and conservation of natural resources in and around Los Angeles County. On Saturday, April 18, 2009, they held a community service event behind UCLA’s Anderson Graduate School of Business. During this three hour project, nearly 30 volunteers came together to remove the weeds and the invasive species, such as morning glories, dandelions, and crabgrass, from along the banks of the creek running behind Anderson. Volunteers were placed along the west side of the creek’s bank and throughout the morning we removed a significant portion of invasive species that have crowded out the native plants, such as the golden currant and the arroyo willow. As a volunteer in this event, I assisted in removing the invasive species by pulling crabgrass for a majority of the morning. This area along the creek has been an ongoing Santa Monica Baykeeper project, where they have removed a tremendous amount of invasive species, and they have begun replanting native plants. The native species are marked with distinguishable flags sitting next to them so as to ensure that volunteers, such as myself, can recognize these species and ensure that they are not removed during the invasive species removal. Working section by section, we removed the invasive species from the bank’s edge, leaving nothing but dirt and native plants behind. This removal allows native plants, such as the arroyo willow, to re-occupy this area and keeps the dirt from disappearing into the river. Santa Monica Baykeeper locates areas that have the potential to be restored and utilizes mainly volunteers to restore the natural habitat that has been either significantly altered or completely destroyed. By removing the invasive species, we in turn free up the land so that native species can be replanted and thrive in their natural habitat. Removing invasive species is also important because they typically have very shallow roots, just as crabgrass does, so they do not hold down the soil very effectively. By replacing these invasive species with the natural plants found throughout the area, we are preventing erosion and restoring the original species to this habitat. Because most of the labor accomplished by Santa Monica Baykeeper is done by volunteers, the immediate effects of this project were not seen. Removing the invasive species is firstly required in order to provide space the native species. However, due to the limited amount of time spent on this project on that Saturday, it was impossible to see the immediate final product, as it is more than a one day project. After re-planting the native plants in this area, this section of the creek will be finished, as the plants are self sustainable in their native habitat.
Comment by Rebecca Heywood April 27, 2009 @ 4:43 amOn April 18, 2009 the Santa Monica Baykeepers organized a work day for the Stone Canyon Creek Restoration Project. The purpose of the Stone Canyon Creek Restoration Project is to protect and restore the section of this creek that is still above ground and on the UCLA campus. Volunteers and staff members helped removed as much non-native or invasive vegetation from the area near the creek as possible. Although not during this particular work day, past days have included the planting of native vegetation as well as removal of large, very invasive trees near the creek. This section of the creek is the only part still above ground and closer its original state on the entire UCLA campus.
The volunteers that showed up consisted mostly of Baykeeper staff, some high school local students, and UCLA environment 170 students. My role in the event as a volunteer, as well as most of the other volunteers, was to remove non-native invasive grasses from the soil near the creek. I used tools and my bare hands to pull up as much grass as possible. After being removed from the ground these plants were taken away from the area. I had to make sure that the roots of the grasses were completely removed from the area to prevent the grass from re-growing after being pulled.
Invasive species can sometimes decrease the stability of the slope next to the creek in some cases. The presence of native vegetation not only filters pollution, but is also necessary for the stability of the entire ecosystem. This is why the restoration project also includes the installation of native species as well as the removal of invasive species. Restoring native species can help bring back other native wildlife as well. It has been shown that natural waterways provide both a cleaner water supply for ourselves and the environment and promotes a healthier ecosystem as oppose to man-made cement waterways. The Santa Monica Baykeepers receive money to complete projects from both donations and government grants. The staff members and many volunteers provide the labor to accomplish restoration projects like this. Although the task of vegetation removal does not appear to be a very interesting experience, the combination of knowing how important these actions are to sustaining the creek, learning about the interaction of native wildlife and watershed health and being in a beautiful and at-least partially natural environment made the experience very rewarding.
Comment by rileyrichardson April 27, 2009 @ 5:50 amThe restoration took place on April 18 from 10-1 behind the Anderson School of Business and was organized by Santa Monica Baykeeper. First we removed the tree trimmings that were all over the ground on the side of the creek nearest to the business school. For most of the day we removed the non-native grass that was growing on the other side of the creek and crowding out the native plants that were planted earlier. We used various weed pulling tools and small picks to make sure that we removed the grasses and their roots so that they would not grow back. We also had to be careful to not damage the native plants that were growing, and there were flags marking the native plants. Later others watered the plants that had been growing. The science behind the event is that the non-native plants have shallower roots than the native plants. The native species have deeper roots and hold onto the soil and prevent erosion, as well as providing a habitat for animals. The invasive species do not provide food or a habitat for animals. The plants and soil around the stream prevent water from washing into the stream before the soil can filter the water and remove impurities. I was happy to see that the ivy that I helped pull out in the fall hadn’t grown back much and that many of the native plants we had planted were still alive. More native plants will probably be planted at the next restoration since the rainy season is over and the grass shouldn’t be able to grow back. Hopefully more birds and other animals will start coming back to the creek area as the native plants grow. It may seem to those who have just seen the creek for the first time that not much has been done but looking at the pictures from before gives an appreciation for how much work has been done and seeing it now shows how much work still needs to be done. It will take time and a lot of work but I think the area will be a good habitat in a few years.
Comment by Stephanie Falzone April 27, 2009 @ 9:11 pmI attended the Stone Canyon Creek Restoration on Saturday April 18, and though it was my second time participating in the restoration, much has changed over the course of a few months. When I first attended the creek restoration in the fall, we were primarily removing the Algerian ivy that covered the entire east side of the creek. This ivy was introduced as a way to keep the creek looking “neat” as it can provide a ground cover, keeping litter out of sight. This ivy was difficult to remove, as it was not only firmly rooted in the soil but was also heavily layered, so we had to remove layers one at a time. This time around however, volunteers focused their work on the west side of the creek, where we did less intensive invasive weed removal. The idea behind this is that once these non-native plants are removed we can add in native plants that will increase the biodiversity (non-native species tend to out compete the native ones) and in some cases will favor the soil and the habitat more than the non-native species did. It was somewhat frustrating to learn that after we removed the non-native weeds, they may grow back again within weeks, however with repetition of this process eventually the roots of the grass will be removed and their presence on the creek bed will be eradicated.
Comment by Tali Pomerantz April 29, 2009 @ 12:35 amIt may be a long process to restoring the Stone Canyon Creek to what it originally was, but by going through and repeatedly removing the invasive species, Heal the Bay is slowly making an impact on the area. Once these species stop regrowing in the area, new species can be planted. The goal in invasive species removal is to ultimately plant species that will compliment the environment, and are naturally suited to grow here. I found from reading Meg Sullivan’s graduate thesis, as well as from the Heal the Bay talk in lecture, that some of the plants to be later introduced in the area are pittosporum, loquat, and fluid amber. Also from this document I learned about UC Berkeley’s Strawberry Creek, which is something like the equivalent of the Stone Canyon Creek to the UCLA community. This brought to my attention the impact that having a creek like this near campus could have as an educational tool for students in the sciences, especially ecology and environmental science. As of now the Stone Canyon Creek, to the best of my knowledge, remains a completely untapped resource in terms of education (besides our class’ and other organizations’ removal efforts) however hopefully in the future more students can become aware of what we have right in our backyard!
The Santa Monica Bay Keepers have been working hard to keep alive a valuable resource on the UCLA campus that most of the students take for granted. In fact, other than drunken after-dark escapades, I doubt most students would even be aware that the campus has a creek, much less appreciate it. The monthly service that the Santa Monica Bay Keepers plan is an ongoing project to remove all the invasive vegetation around Stone Canyon Creek and replace it with native plants to improve the health of the system.
Comment by Michelle Honda April 29, 2009 @ 2:04 amThis last event on April 18th was my second time working with the Bay Keepers, and I must say that having done the same event twice really puts things in perspective. The goal was to remove any invasive plant species and maintain the health of the native plants that the Bay Keepers planted in previous months. The first time I attended was in February when the volunteers spent the entire three hours weeding grasses. This more recent time, I came back expecting to plant some more native plants or water them, but instead I again spent the three hours weeding. As it turns out invasives are pretty persistent and our back breaking work the first month simply cleared the area for a different kind of invasive to take over the area.
Unfortunately, upon talking with Mark, I found out that the nonprofit organization has recently had difficulties with funding, especially the bond money that usually keeps them afloat. But they are doing their best to scrape by, especially in projects like Stone Canyon Creek, where a hiatus could virtually undo all the months of hard work in a matter of weeks, which became evident to me upon my return to the creek.
The Santa Monica Bay Keepers are also involved in less hands-on projects, working to influence state and local policy on the watershed. Their focus is to restore the watershed to something more akin to its natural state, which, in the long run, will be more beneficial to everyone. Natural streams work to absorb the energy of flash floods and also filter the water before it reaches the ocean. When the US Army Corps of Engineers channelized the river and the streams, they tried to control a dynamic system. It is now, years later, that we see that the river is trying to take back the land that originally belonged to it as the concrete walls and boulders have collapsed in some places and are in need of repair.
As such, the Santa Monica Bay Keepers have been working to convince the people of the wealth of resources streams can provide. For instance, they were successful in replacing an asphalt parking lot with a permeable one at Malibu State Park which will filter large amounts of rainfall before it reaches the ocean, working to improve the water quality at the beach, which currently receives a consistent weekly letter grade of F. Hopefully, in time, the mitigation and restoration of the Santa Monica Bay Keepers will help river and stream health become a more up front issue in Southern California.
April 18, 2009
It started off as a warm morning, as I began my day with Santa Monica Baykeepers in efforts to help restore stone creek canyon. This canyon believe it or not exists just down near Anderson, the school of business. Hidden away under the many hoovering trees, grows unwanted invasive species and rescue the native species that existed from the previous restoration. This event would make it the second time that I have helped with the this project and even though I spent most of the day helping last time there was still much to be done. From the last time that we were there we were able to take out the unwanted grass and clean up the soil. Soon after we were able to plant 250 native plants. We had Hogwarts, miniature roses, blueberry and oak trees. This time around much of the native plants that we had planted from before needed to be saved from the growth of incoming weeds that had sprouted up. We were able to clear out a good bit of it. For the next few years we must try and make sure that the weeds don’t take over the area again and the native species there are able to survive and be self sustaining.
Comment by Jaynel Santos May 5, 2009 @ 8:41 amFor me personally in this experience has given me an upper hand in the knowledge of gardening. I currently the garden coordinator up at sun set recreation and I am able to use my skills from that even to the garden. I have also gained a personal feeling of accomplishment that I have at least contributed to do a small part for the creek. I have learned that there aren’t many natural creeks around and this one in particular has a lot of potential with the proper car it could make many inspirations for other locations as well.
Helping the Santa Monica Baykeeper on April 18th, I participated in the watershed restoration of Stone Canyon Creek. I never saw the creek before and was thoroughly surprised to hear of its existence. From the paved walkway, I could barely distinguish the faint outline of a stream, anticipating a mere trickle of water; but once I crossed to the dirt path and stared over the creekbed, I marveled at the breath of the stream and the speed of its flow. The SM Baykeeper’s project aims towards removing non-native vegetation which dominates the region, depriving native plants of vital resources. The invasive non-native vegetation, with its short roots, proves ineffective in supporting the soil surrounding the creekbed, eventually contributing to its disintegration and the constriction of the water’s flow. Planting native vegetation, the SM Baykeepers reinforce the creekbed’s structure, calculating that the native plants’ lengthy (and hence, deeply embedded) roots will prevent the creek’s encompassing terrain from collapsing. As a bonus, the native vegetation also provides habitats for the neighboring wildlife.
Comment by Tina Hoang May 30, 2009 @ 11:17 pmArmed with a pitchfork half my size and other various gardening tools, the Baykeepers, my fellow volunteers, and I tackled the hilly landscape infested with non-native vegetation, viciously uprooting them so they won’t re-grow. (Of course, Stone Canyon Creek will need periodic volunteer missions to weed non-natives out completely, but we have perseverance). Among the chaotic clouds of dirt, volunteers churned soil, flung uprooted plants onto canvas sheets, and dragged them to a dumpster. We carefully avoided the recently-planted native vegetation, labeled with a tiny colorful flags, and watered them, hoping for their survival. Surrounded by so much verdure, I welcomed the change in atmosphere. I felt secluded from the urban bustling of cars and temporarily forgot I was still in Los Angeles as I dug my hands in dirt and listened to the creek’s rushing water.
In the restoration of the Stone Canyon Creek, the SM Baykeepers advocate government policy towards preserving natural rivers rather than constructing human-made waterways (with cement foundations). Natural rivers effectively absorb harmful chemicals; unlike human-made rivers which transport them into our drinking water supply or towards our oceans. In creating cement riverbeds, we disrupt the ecosystem, destroying habitats and endangering watershed animals. Restoring Stone Canyon Creek, the Baykeepers and their volunteers pull out invasive plants to preserve the natural structure of the river and reverse detrimental anthropogenic effects on watershed ecology.
On Saturday, May 30th of 2009 I went behind the Anderson School of Business to work with the Santa Monica Bay Keepers, on the Stone Canyon Resoration Project. The event consisted of a bunch of students taking burlap sheets and gloves, with pitchforks. We were instructed to dig up the root of the plant to make sure it doesn’t come back. We collected the the roots and made piles of the invasive plants, and placed them in a big trailer for removal. We were told not to dig up any plants that had flags posted on them, as these were native species that were either there originally or specially planted there for the purpose of the restoration. We used many tools, like pitchforks and rakes, alone with little hammers to help dig up the roots of these plants.
Comment by Holly May 31, 2009 @ 12:29 amSome plants were easy to remove because they were obviously not meant to be there. Such a plant for example was the mustard plant. With the bright yellow flowers of this invasive plant, it was easy to tell it had to go. However, other plants looked very similar to the Muttle, which was silvery underneath its leaves. This was a good way to make sure you were not remvoing a plant that was wanted!
My role in the event was mostly digging up a lot of crab grass underneath the pine tree, and working on the hill. However I also randomly went around emptying the burlap bags of other people to help out as well. My role was to help out in this goal of restoration.
The science behind this event is to remove these invasive plants because the roots are very small and erosion is occuring and this is not good for Stone Creek. For example, a lot of dirt and pollutants are washed into the stream because the soil is loose in the ground. As a result, pollutants are carried into the ocean. By removing these plants, and putting in native plants this prevents the erosion from happening. This is because many of the native plants have deeper thicker roots that are able to prevent erosion. With more native plants in the area, this will help keep soil from washing away and getting in the water as well as preventing the stream from becoming contaminated. When the stream gets contaminated it is a problem because it carries all of the pollutants down stream.
This project corralated very well with the “policy/rationale” because many good things are resulting from this. Through their research which is conducted using GPS and topographic photography, they have been able to map the areas of the stream into specific portions to ensure accuracy in their research. In addition, bringing back native plants will also provide food for the birds in the area, which will bring back the diviertisty of birds. There are bird watchers that come in through the area and take data on which species they have seen in this remote stream area, to let the researches know weather or not the birds are coming back or not. Many of these invasive plants do not provide thr right food for the birds, hence probably why many of them have left.
On May 30, 2009, I took part in the Santa Monica Baykeepers’ Stone Canyon Creek Restoration Project behind the Anderson Building at UCLA. There were about 40 students that took part in this event, most of which were from UCLA. Our main goal was to remove the invasive species so that the SM Baykeepers can plant native species near and around the creek. In order to prevent the weeds from spreading, we had to make sure that we completely removed the roots of the weeds from the ground. This was actually pretty tough when I was removing bigger weeds because the roots were thicker and harder to pull out. Several times I had to try to pull out the same weed because I did not remove the entire root. At first, I was removing the smaller grass weeds further away from the creek; however, later on I started pulling out the bigger weeds (which I believe was Poison Hemlock) closer to the creek. As I got closer to the creek, there were more native species (marked by flags) that were planted in that I was to avoid from removing. I was successful in that regard; however, it remains to be seen later if I completely removed the weeds that I was supposed to pull out.
The main goal of this project and of the Santa Monica Baykeepers is to restore Stone Canyon Creek and other waterways to their natural forms. Natural waterways are better at filtering and draining chemicals and other substances from reaching the ocean. The purpose of replacing the invasive species with native plants is to prevent the creek from disappearing. The roots of the weeds have shallow roots; therefore, during a storm, they can be displaced. This provides less shade cover for the creek, which leads to the evaporation of part of or the whole creek. Furthermore, as stated before, we do not want this to be replaced by an artificial waterway. A main secondary goal of this project is to promote the biodiversity of native species of the area. This is being accomplished by planting of native plants. According to Mark, the area has lost 46 of its bird species. Hopefully, with the presence of the native species, these bird species will return to the area. I believe that this restoration project helps the Baykeepers try to achieve their goal in restoring the Ballona Creek and preserving natural waterways. Hopefully, our service was of benefit because if we failed to completely remove the weeds, they could grow back stronger than before.
Comment by Tristan Acob May 31, 2009 @ 3:40 amOn Saturday, May 30, 2009, I volunteered at the Stone Canyon Restoration project hosted by the Santa Monica Baykeeper organization. I arrived at the Anderson School of Management at 10:00 a.m., where director Mark Abramson and helper Heather Burdick instructed us on how to differentiate between native and non-native plants in the creek. The purpose of the restoration project was to remove non-native plants from the area to allow native plants to re-grow. Although there was still some remaining non-native vegetation in the area, most of it had already been cleared during earlier site visits. The newly-planted native flora was marked with colored flags, and volunteers were briefed to avoid uprooting these specific plants; otherwise, we were told to dig up the rest of the vegetation. With about 20 total volunteers, the team cleared away the non-native plants to make room for native plants to be planted in their place. Non-native plant species were found on the creek beds and on the nearby hills on either side.
Comment by Kathryn Iwanaga May 31, 2009 @ 8:29 amWe wore provided gardening gloves and shared gardening tools to help us uproot the plants. I picked a small garden spading fork as my tool, and then proceeded to dig up the unmarked plants. Over the course of three hours, I uprooted weeds with the fork and a smaller weed tool, careful to avoid the flagged native plants. I even donned rubber boots and wadded into the creek to cut at the grasses growing along the bank. Although I grew tired from bending and cutting the roots, near the end of the event I enjoyed being in the creek and breathing fresh air.
The main concepts in the project were the overabundance of invasive non-native plants and the restoration of native plants. The definition of a non-native plant is one that is not from the local area, but is able to effectively invade a new environment. This is because the native plants are unfamiliar with the new species and have not evolved adaptations to address the new threat. Meanwhile, the native plants have difficulty in competing against this unknown species, and therefore lose territory to the new plant. This reduces their numbers in their native habitat, making the spread of invasive non-native plants quick and efficient.
The public policy rationale for the event comes from trying to return the environment to its native state. It is believed that removing non-native plants would eliminate a threat to the competition, and planting new trees would restore the ecosystem. This would allow the return of native birds to the area, although 46 had already become extinct as a result of the changing landscape. Removal of the non-native plants would reduce the number of invasive species in California and allow the native plants to reclaim some of their lost territory.
From the event, it was evident that clearing out the banks of the creek of the non-native species allowed room for the native plants to grow. On the nearby hill, some newly-planted native plants were growing tall and healthy, signifying that with reduced competition, the native plants were able to survive. Should there be further non-native plant removal at Stone Canyon creek, along with the planting of native vegetation, there should be more success and evidence that native plants can make a comeback and reclaim their native soil.
Holly Mraovich
Community Service Project
Environmental Science 170
On Saturday, May 30th of 2009 I went behind the Anderson School of Business to work with the Santa Monica Bay Keepers, on the Stone Canyon Restoration Project. The event consisted of a bunch of students taking burlap sheets and gloves, with pitchforks. We were instructed to dig up the root of the plant to make sure it doesn’t come back. We collected the the roots and made piles of the invasive plants, and placed them in a big trailer for removal. We were told not to dig up any plants that had flags posted on them, as these were native species that were either there originally or specially planted there for the purpose of the restoration. We used many tools, like pitchforks and rakes, alone with little hammers to help dig up the roots of these plants.
Some plants were easy to remove because they were obviously not meant to be there. Such a plant for example was the mustard plant. With the bright yellow flowers of this invasive plant, it was easy to tell it had to go. However, other plants looked very similar to the Muttle, which was silvery underneath its leaves. This was a good way to make sure you were not removing a plant that was wanted!
My role in the event was mostly digging up a lot of crab grass underneath the pine tree, and working on the hill. However I also randomly went around emptying the burlap bags of other people to help out as well. My role was to help out in this goal of restoration.
The science behind this event is to remove these invasive plants because the roots are very small and erosion is occurring and this is not good for Stone Creek. For example, a lot of dirt and pollutants are washed into the stream because the soil is loose in the ground. As a result, pollutants are carried into the ocean. By removing these plants, and putting in native plants this prevents the erosion from happening. This is because many of the native plants have deeper thicker roots that are able to prevent erosion. With more native plants in the area, this will help keep soil from washing away and getting in the water as well as preventing the stream from becoming contaminated. When the stream gets contaminated it is a problem because it carries all of the pollutants down stream.
This project correlated very well with the “policy/rationale” because many good things are resulting from this. Through their research which is conducted using GPS and topographic photography, they have been able to map the areas of the stream into specific portions to ensure accuracy in their research. In addition, bringing back native plants will also provide food for the birds in the area, which will bring back the diversity of birds. There are bird watchers that come in through the area and take data on which species they have seen in this remote stream area, to let the researches know weather or not the birds are coming back or not. Many of these invasive plants do not provide the right food for the birds, hence probably why many of them have left.
Comment by environment170 May 31, 2009 @ 9:38 pmOn May 30, the Santa Monica Bay Keeper a restoration project of Stone Canyon Creek located behind the Anderson School Of Business and Management. The project is very practical and I hope that its efforts are noticed and will attract more attention. It is important that Stone Canyon Creek receive this attention in that it is essentially the last remaining piece of natural habitat on the UCLA campus. It is currently under attack by invasive species such as, mustard plants, non-native grasses, etc. In order to battle this issue certain steps must be followed so you don’t cause more damage then harm. An inventory should be done to identify what plants are considered native and what plants would be considered alien. This has already been done to where our role as volunteers essentially was to pluck out all plants identified as alien species.
Comment by Mohammed Iqbal June 1, 2009 @ 3:13 amMy role in the event involved a pitchfork, a burlap sack, and brute force. Although this role may sound gruesome by the tools necessary to accomplish my task, I assure you any damage done by myself was geared towards the non-native species, which I personally consider bullies of the plant kingdom. The native species need someone to stick up for them against these weedy plants trying to crowd them out and take over their turf. So, that is exactly one of the primary tasks asked of all of the volunteers in today’s restoration project. And by doing this these shallow rooted alien plants will no longer cause stress on the habitat. Where if this goal is accomplished, then the overall goal of restoring the natural riparian habitat will be restored.
Analyzing the political components to an event such as this should be geared on the fact that the actual restoration is not being done by the government at all. Although the UCLA is considered a public Institution, the actual restoration of an area that lies within its property is not being done by campus efforts at all. The restoration is being accomplished voluntarily by students and others affiliated with the Santa Monica Bay Keeper. The science behind the event is to prevent water contamination of the stream, which runs through stone canyon creek. It was important to exterminate the non-native species because most of them had shallow roots this was producing changes to the soil structure in turn causing a greater potential for contamination of the water within the stream. Therefore, pulling weeds and removing alien species was also protecting the water running through the area.
On Saturday, May 30th 2009, I joined a group of UCLA students and volunteers from other organizations, to assist the Santa Monica Baykeepers in the Stone Canyon Creek Restoration Project that is taking place on the UCLA campus. The goal of the volunteer groups was to extirpate invasive plant species – including large plants as well as grasses – to leave room and resources for the native plants – such as hummingbird sage, willows, sycamore, and blackberry – to grow back.
Comment by jessica June 1, 2009 @ 4:00 amWhile the Santa Monica Baykeepers and volunteers with more expertise planted colored flags to signal the native plants to be left in place, the role of most students and myself was to proceeded to physically remove weeds and other invasive plants from the soil, making sure that we pulled the plants out entirely – both stems and roots – to prevent them from growing back in the future. The uprooted weeds were then collected onto a trailer, probably to be utilized as compostable biomass. At the same time, volunteers watered the native plants to aid their healthy growth.
From a larger perspective, the motivation behind this work, and the Santa Monica Baykeepers’ goal in general, is to restore waterways throughout the L.A. county – such as this creek – to their natural state, by re-establishing a natural, native ecosystem, and restoring water quality. The significance of our particular case was that it dealt with the creek behind the Anderson School of Management, which used to be a relevant landmark in the local topography, but has been almost completely channeled into an underground drainpipe to facilitate the expansion of the University; the section of the creek near which we worked is in fact the only part that remains exposed to daylight, and the area surrounding it has been profoundly altered by the proliferation of invasive vegetation species, with the consequent loss of native plants, and the degradation of what constituted the habitat for a variety of wildlife species. Clearing out the ground from the non-native vegetation will therefore allow for the native flora to be successfully re-planted and prosper; when these original elements will be restored, animal species might be able to repopulate the area as well, including the diversity of birds and butterflies that used to live in this ecosystem.
This project and this event is in accord with this rationale, as it adopts a systematic approach that covers the tasks of increasing and supporting the native plants, while ridding the area of invasive ones, and following the progress throughout time. By repeating the procedures carried out during this event, the Santa Monica Baykeepers and alternating volunteers ensure that the composition of the flora is kept under control, until the native plants are strong and abundant enough to achieve and maintain the balances of the original ecosystem.
Suza Khy
I attended the Stone Canyon Creek Restoration community service event this past Saturday, May 30, 2009. In unison with roughly fifty volunteers from UCLA and the Santa Monica Baykeepers, our goal was to clear the Creek from invasive species, weed and grass. With garden gloves, heavy duty tools, and the diligence of fifty volunteers, in roughly two hours, Stone Canyon Creek transformed from a negligent water way behind the Anderson School of Management to a beautiful creek hidden and lost from the university.
As a volunteer for this community service, my role extends beyond my physical labor – pulling weeds and grass from the slopes of the Creek. I hope to share my new knowledge of distinguishing between an invasive weed and native plants. In coming to the community service, I was clueless to the procedures and role I played. However as the day progressed I slow began to learn how to work as a collective group to achieve our goal of restoring the creek. The community service event brought a sense of accomplishment and energy to me being an Environmental Science major. I hope to bring the same sense of renewed enthusiasm to my fellow peers. Thus, as we are providing our manual labor and clearing the Creek of these persistent weeds and grass, we are also empowering ourselves and our community to be more conscious of the environmental needs on our campus.
Because of our immigration and migratory paths and trading between various world nations, we are faced with a destructing environmental crisis, the introduction of invasion species to non-native ecosystems. The systems within ecosystems are crucial to maintain the function of that particular environment. However, the amount of available resources to the organisms is finite and limited. In a stable ecosystem, there exists an equilibrium of the utilization of available resources by the native organisms. Ecosystems are flexible and dynamic, but the system needs time to recover from the cases of a disturbance and reach a new equilibrium. In the case of introducing new species, these species tend to have no systematic balance within the ecosystem, thus they proliferate and multiply more quickly than native species. The equilibrium and balance is changed and the availability for resources narrows as the competition for the same resources increase. As a result this drastically affects the ecosystem by changing its composition of species which changes the function and role of the ecosystem to the larger biosphere. Therefore invasive species are threatening to the very composition and structure of our local, regional, and global environment. The United States has been able to recognize the plight of our ecosystems by signing Executive Order 13112 on February 1999 which calls on Executive Branch agencies to work to prevent and control the introduction and spread of invasive species. In a political climate that favored decentralization of government due to the rise of skepticism and fraudulent governmental activities, President Clinton has cross political boundaries to resurge a sense of governmental accountability to this environmental crisis. As invasive species continue to plague our ecosystems and niches, actions such as the community service hosted by the Santa Monica Baykeepers delivers a powerful message of a commitment to community environmental engagement and demonstrates our resilience to the powerful forces and inconsistencies of nature and U.S. environmental policy.
Comment by Suza Khy June 1, 2009 @ 6:31 pmI volunteered on May 30, 2009 to assist SM bay keepers with the Stone Canyon Creek restoration near the Anderson Business School on UCLA campus. Although I transferred to this school last year, I was delightfully surprised that such a sizeable creek exists on this largely urban campus. Along with other UCLA volunteers, our job was to help clear the lake of invasive plant species, like mustard plants, to facilitate the re-growth of native plants such as sycamore and blackberries. The SM bay keepers had already labeled the native plants with flags, and our jobs as volunteers were to dig up all the invasive species with pitch forks and place them in a big pile for removal. My role was simply to remove as many invasive plants as possible and remove their roots to ensure they did not grow back.
Comment by Miles Meyer June 1, 2009 @ 10:12 pmThe SM Bay Keepers main goal is to restore LA county waterways to their natural state by attempting to restore water quality and re establish Natural ecosystems. The rationale behind the event was that these invasive species were negatively impacting the creek by changing soil structure, causing soil to fall into the stream, and was preventing native wildlife’s habitat from growing, thereby disrupting the creeks’ natural ecosystem. The invasive plants’ shallow roots led to increased soil erosion near the creek, which in turn led to the creek becoming contaminated with pollutants from the soil. Luckily for me, the shallow roots meant that the invasive plants were not too difficult to remove. By removing invasive species, the bay keepers hope that the native birds that once inhabited the creek will return, and the proliferation of native species along with the birds’ return will help restore the creeks’ natural ecosystem.
This restoration event on campus matched up perfectly to the Bay Keepers’ rationale. The removal of invasive species is of utmost importance if the native plant species are to re establish themselves around the creek. Also the effect of this seemingly simple concept is that the native plants that provided food and shelter for native birds will be able to flourish, and their roots will help decrease the erosion of soil around the creek, which would prevent any further contamination of the water. As a result of this, the natural ecosystem of the creek will be able to rebound, and native birds and plants will once again flourish, and the water quality will improve dramatically. For lack of a better term, the invasive species removal is like killing two birds with one stone!
On May 30th, 2009 at approximately 10:00 AM, I volunteered for the Santa Monica Bay Keeper, Stone Canyon Creek restoration project. The creek was located behind the UCLA Anderson School of Management, and very much hidden in the UCLA campus. The project aimed to restore the natural area surrounding Stone Canyon creek as well as shed light on important environmental issues such as invasive species and urbanization. Stone Canyon creek was once a large river that flowed through the UCLA campus many years ago however, construction and the lack of prioritizing natural habitat eventually lead to the small hidden creek it is today. Thus, to work on this project was an issue personal for it would contribute to my experience as a UCLA student.
Comment by Dale Douk June 1, 2009 @ 10:35 pmWhen my classmates and I got to the event, we began right away with uprooting and weeding out invasive species. At first glance, we noticed a large hill right above the creek that was filled with invasive species. I honestly was not sure how much we could get done because it looked like a lot of work. However, with the help of about 20 other people on the same hill, we managed to clear away a very large portion of it, reviving a new hill for native species to thrive. It was really interesting to mark species that were native and flag them, while uprooting all of the plants that were consuming all the natural resources.
It was also interesting to do an environmental project that required us to uproot plants, however the significance of removing these plants was an issue of conservation. Invasive species are a major issue and threat to natural habitat. It is able to colonize areas, deplete surrounding resources, and eventually kick out native species. Thus, keeping these plant species under control is an issue because native species play a major role in the biodiversity and overall health of the affected area.
The science and policy rationale for this event was to restore a natural habitat that has been altered heavily by construction on the UCLA campus. The river, having once flowed through the campus, is now a small section that empties into a storm drain. In a densely populated city such as Los Angeles, the local community as well as UCLA students, found it important to restore native habitats, such as Stone Canyon. In the larger environmental movement, the restoration project may lead the way for more environmental policies around Los Angeles.
I recently removed invasive species from Stone Creek on UCLA’s campus. This was done with Mark and the Santa Monica Baykeeper’s. My primary tool was a pitch fork. my task was to remove any plant, grass or shrubbery that wasn’t marked with a flag. These species are invasive and are harmful to the restoration of this natural creek. I wore gardening gloves so I could rip out plant with my hands as well as the pitch fork. I got down to Stone Creek at 10:15 and worked until a little after noon. Overall, the work was pretty demanding because it required manuel labor to remove the invasive. It is important to rebuild the natural habitat because the goal of the project is too restore the natural image and ecosystem of Stone Creek. Obviously, UCLA construction has severely altered the flow of the creek and forced the channelization of the natural body. Stone Creek is a small area that remains above ground and therefore should be kept as pristine as possible. By the end of the day, the creek basin was mostly cleared of the invasive species, and naturally occurring greenery was planted.
Comment by Jaryd Block June 4, 2009 @ 3:03 amSaturday May 30th i joined about 40 other volunteers at the Stone Canyon Creek behind the Anderson School of Business. I had participated in creek restoration in November of 2008 and have not see the state of the creek until this May restoration. I was initially shocked at how intensely the invasive vegetation and the weeds had come back. The entire area that we had cleared was once again covered with vegetation. I mentioned this to one of the coordinators and she told me that this had happened because of the showers we had had in the last months.
I started to work in a corner area by pulling out the weeds. In the last restorations after the land was cleared native vegetation was planted in that are and most of them were flagged as an indication that they should not be removed. However, because of the height and the density of the weeds many of the native plants that had been previously planted were not visible were being pulled out by some of the volunteers. It is important to note that not all of these plants were flagged in the first place.
A suggestion I would make to the organizers of the Stone Creek restoration events would be to make sure that the volunteers are well informed about how to adequately help with the restoration. Most if not all of the volunteers are there with the good will of helping the restoration so in order to make the most value out of this event I believe it is essential to make sure that the volunteers understand how to help in the most effective manner. Another suggestion would be creating teams amongst the volunteers and assigning each team a specific area or task. This would help focus the volunteers and would avoid situations where volunteers do not know what to do or are just wandering around looking for work.
The restoration of the creek is important because by removing the invasive vegetation and planting native plant species we enable the possibility of creating a habitat where native animal species will be able to return and flourish. Not only that, but it is also important to note that proper vegetation in the creek can help improve the water quality by absorbing and filtering out pollutants.
Nonetheless, volunteering at the Stone Creek Canyon restoration has always been a fun and enjoyable experience. I highly recommend attendance to this event for future community service projects and also just for those that wish to give back to their community.
Comment by Miriam Urena June 4, 2009 @ 7:04 amLast Sunday, I rode my bike out to the UCLA Anderson School of Management to participate in the Stone Canyon Creek restoration project. I had heard about this lone creek running through our campus during my fall quarter, but hadn’t taken the time to visit it then. I also had learned that there had been many creeks and streams running through our campus, along with canyons in north campus. But due to expansion of the campus and increased enrollment of students, many buildings were constructed that got priority over the natural landscape.
Comment by jenny kim June 4, 2009 @ 4:59 pmI arrived at the site at 10am where I was glad to see many of my fellow classmates and environmental enthusiasts. We were instructed on the various types of plants that we would observe at the creek, and told to remove the invasive species because they are shallow rooters. This increased the likelihood of erosion of soil into the stream, which would contaminate and cloud the water. One of the points of this restoration project was also to bring back more bird species to the creek, which have flocked away in the past two decades. The birds will return when their habitat is once again familiar. Another goal of the project by the Santa Monica Baykeepers is to replant native species after removing the invasive ones. Then we grabbed gloves, burlap bags, pitchforks or hand shovels, and headed to the creek. I was surprised by how small the creek was and how drastically the topography changed from the creek to the school. I worked for two hours at various points of the creek to remove mugwort, mustard seed, grass, and other weeds. These plants had taken over the entire landscape and crowded out native plants. This affects the ecosystem of the stream and biodiversity of the area.
This restoration project is significant for UCLA because it shows that there is still hope to revive vital areas and the natural land. It is important to preserve and conserve wilderness areas and various biotas that are left today. They provide priceless services to our Earth’s functioning that are necessary for its survival. We have to work from a precautionary standpoint and avoid harming the land beyond recovery because it becomes very costly and time-consuming to repair damage. This is seen in the EPA Superfund sites that are highly toxic areas with hazardous wastes and/or nuclear wastes.
It is also important for our generation to do hands-on work to re-visit our natural connection to the land as stewards of the environment. This is a basic step that we should take to restore our natural resources. I hope that the Santa Monica Baykeepers can engage more students to get involved and carry on their work.
On April 18, 2009, I volunteered for the Stone Canyon Creek restoration put on by the Santa Monica Bay Keepers. I, along with many other UCLA students and volunteers, was involved in the removal of non-native species from behind the Anderson School of Business at UCLA. By the time my roommates and I showed up to the site at about 9:50 am that morning, there were only a handful of people and we thought that at least we were going to have a lot to do. So we signed in, grabbed our gloves, sacks, shovel, and pitchforks and headed down to the site.
Comment by Christopher From June 5, 2009 @ 12:38 amThe main idea of the project was to remove non-native and invasive species from Stone Canyon Creek surrounding the Anderson School at UCLA. We not only removed the plants themselves, but there roots as well so they could not grow back. We also were told that all of the flags next to some plants meant that they were native and not to remove those so that they could flourish after we had removed the invasive species. They also told us to bring back the plants that we had ripped out to a disposable unit they provided so that we were not only removing the invasive plants, but so they could also be put to good use as compost biomass for plant food. It felt good to help with a cleanup and to help the native species of California thrive and survive amidst the many invasive species that were there, especially since our studies in school do not usually have too many hands on experiences. As an MIMG major, you don’t really ever deal with how the environment is being affected by plants, only invasive pathogens, however, as the day progressed and talking with the Santa Monica Bay Keeper’s, I came to realize that not just pathogens from world travel do harm to our environment.
People were spread out all over the place and as we were walking over to what we identified as an open spot, we picked up on how to remove quite quickly. So, we set down the burlap sack and went at removing the tall grass first. As we looked around each time we had filled a sack and my one roommate took it back to the disposal unit each time (because he felt it would be easier by himself), my other roommate and I looked around at how other people were doing in their spots. We thought we made everyone else look like they were standing still. Each time we took a full sack back to the disposal unit, a lot of other groups, especially student groups, were in the same spot they were 20 minutes before. We were out there to do a job, and they were out there to socialize and take pictures. The frustration drove us to work even harder.
Once we were done with the tall grasses, we moved up the hill towards the parking lot and started taking out the much larger, more plant-like weeds. As we were tearing and ripping out all of the plants that did not have the native flag designating those that were not to be ripped out, the Santa Monica Bay Keepers came over to us and told us that we were doing a great job and that we should not miss anything, including the plants the bushes lining the fence were covering. They told us that this was because if we left any plants that were non-native, they could spread like wildfire again, destroying what we had done here today. So, my roommates and I, after finishing with the large and easy stuff on the hill, got on our hands and knees and started tearing out all the small plants underneath the bushes.
The Santa Monica Bay Keepers’ mission is to restore native habitats to the native ways, especially focusing on water system quality. This allows for a natural ecosystem to recollect itself and return to the way that it ran before the invasive species. This creek has been almost completely diverted into drainpipes because of the expansion of UCLA, especially for the Anderson School. Since the portion that we worked on is the only spot in which it is above ground, it has a profound impact on the rest of the ecosystem downstream. Thus, when all of the invasive and non-native species are dilapidated and diluted enough, then the native flora can be rekindled and hopefully allow for the native fauna to also return to help it thrive.
The idea behind this even was to help restore natural habitats to their native, natural state. The removal of these invasive species allows for the rebound of not only native species of plants, but native species of animals too because they depend on many of the resources that the native plants bring and the invasive species can contaminate water and other vital resource supplies. This was a very systematic approach to reviving many species because utilizing volunteers, the Bay Keepers can continuously remove non-native and invasive species until the original flora is strong and abundant enough to maintain the original balance of the ecosystem.
On Saturday, May 30th, I volunteered at Stone Canyon Creek. Under the guidance of Mark from the Santa Monica Bay Keepers, I, as well, as several other Environment 170 students, worked hard to remove some of the invasive species that have invaded the creek located behind the Anderson School of Business. I was pleasantly surprised at the size of the creek and the surrounding area as I had never seen it before. Like the majority of the students that participated, I used various gardening tools (pitchfork, rake, etc.) and work gloves to remove as much of the invasive species as possible. The task was surprisingly hard as it was difficult to pull up some of the weeds with their roots still attached and also to avoid the flagged, native species that had been planted earlier in the year. It was important to pull up the roots as well as the rest of the plant because this insured that it would not be able to grow back. The removal of invasive species from the area surrounding the creek is very important in regards to the creek’s maintenance. Because invasive species such as mustard plants have shallow roots, they do a poor job of preventing erosion. In contrast, many of the native species have deeper roots, which function well to keep soil in place. Although the native species have a positive impact on the area, they are unable to compete with the fast growing invasive species. Thus, it is up to organizations such as the Santa Monica Bay Keepers to help maintain the area. Their goal is to return the creek to its natural state. By diligently protecting the newly planted native plants and removing the harmful invasive species, the creek’s future is protected. Furthermore, the polluted water caused by invasive species eventually runs into the ocean, so the creek’s maintenance also works to help keep the oceans clean.
Comment by Jake Palmquist June 6, 2009 @ 1:10 am-Margarita Armendariz 203497322
Stone Creek Canyon Restoration (5/30/09)
This past weekend I participated in the Stone Creek Canyon Restoration behind the Anderson School of Management on UCLA campus. The Stone Creek Canyon Restoration project is directed at clearing out invasive plant species as well as cleaning the area in order to let the native plant species surrounding the area proliferate. This particular volunteer event was held by the Santa Monica Baykeeper organization. During the event, most of what I did was to pull out all of the invasive plant species surrounding the area because they tend to take over the nutrients and push out the native species. While pulling out the weeds and non native species you could see that there were some plants that were marked, that is because these were native species and you did not want to pull these out. The point of reestablishing the presence of these native species to this area and removing the invasive ones, is to allow this native vegetation to grow in order to not only prevent erosion on the banks, but also to provide more habitats for the native insects, animals and birds around this area.
The initial construction of UCLA and its continued development is what led to the habitat surrounding Stone Creek Canyon to be diminished to what is found today. This small scale diminishment of natural habitat has occurred throughout California, but by participating in this restoration it is slowly being helped back to its natural state. Through this restoration, not only is the area being restored and cleaned, but we are further preventing any more species from being displaced or lost due to a decrease in area of their habitat. Further restoration will also prevent any further creation of homogeneous areas, where plant and animal diversity is minimal to none. By restoring Stone Creek Canyon, we are giving the native species in the area a little help by reducing the amount of competition they have to survive against the invasive or exotic species.
The restoration of Stone Creek Canyon falls into the category of conservation of biology. As stated before, the main point of this is to protect species, ecosystems and habitats from diminishing to such a degree where they become extinct. Conservation of biology at this point in time is crucial because of the increasing numbers of species going extinct. If programs like the Stone Creek Canyon Restoration project where not around, the rate at which habitats and species are disappearing would surely be dramatically increased. The speaker that we had, Mark Abramson, from the Santa Monica Baykeeper organization, showed us a lot of evidence to support the idea of restoring creek shores and banks. In addition to showing us what was being done currently to help restore the paths that the creeks used to flow through, he also showed us why these creeks needed to be restored. It was obvious that the current areas that the creeks flowed through were in dire need of cleaning up, and how the natural wildlife was declining due to insufficient and uninhabitable living areas.
Additional Comments: On Saturday, May 30th, i volunteered with a number of other environment 170 students for the Stone Creek Restoration Project lead by the Santa Monica Bay Keepers. I spent most of the time removing invasive species in the watershed as well as hauling bags to the truck. My main tool was a pitchfork, which wasn’t all that effective. The labor was intensive, and although it was nice to be helping the Bay Keepers efforts to restore the creek, i’m not sure if the process will be all that effective. it seems that many of the deep roots of the invasive species were not being removed, thus increasing the chances that they will just come back next year. The main goal of the project is to restore what was once an aesthetic watershed area that has been destroyed by urbanization and invasion of non-native species. The project really opened my eyes to how hard it is to restore a natural habitat. The Stone Creek area is very small, and it is still a very tough task to accomplish. Going out there and working hard and seeing everything makes one think about the massive expanses of ecosystems that have been destroyed or damaged by urban expansion and development of land. It is sad to think that we have most likely lost these habitats forever.
Comment by environment170 June 6, 2009 @ 9:05 pmDevon
On April 18, I participated in the Santa Monica Baykeeper restoration of Stone Canyon Creek. When I arrived, I was told that I was supposed to remove any plants that did not have a little flag right next to them. I basically spent the entire time hacking away at invasive plant species until the hillside was cleared and all the picked plant matter was transported to a dumpster. The science/rationale behind this is that invasive species are detrimental to an environment. They possess evolutionary tools for rapid takeover of an environment that most native species can’t compete with or combat. These species take resources from native species, making it harder for them to survive and sometimes even causing them to go extinct. The aesthetics of an environment overrun by invasive species are also worsened, for these species tend to grow very densely and look pretty ugly. The baykeeper people believe that we have an ethical responsibility to preserve nature and try to save these speciess. The science behind it matched up well with the event, because we successfully removed a great amount of non-native plant matter, giving the native species a fighting chance, and hopefully taking the first step toward putting that environment back to normal, at least for now.
Comment by environment170 June 7, 2009 @ 2:28 amOn May 30, 2009, I participated in the Stone Canyon Creek Restoration. I also participated in the restoration in Fall 2008, so I was happy to see how beautiful the creek has become. I was impressed by all the native plants, marked by colorful flags, the Santa Monica Bay Keepers put back in. However, there was still a large area with weeds and other invasive species. The work I did this time was no different from last time. We pulled out weeds and other invasive species making sure we took out all the roots so they cannot grow back. We had to take out the invasive species, because they compete with the natural vegetation for resources such as nutrients and living space. The invasive plants also had shallow roots, so they cannot hold onto the soil as well as native plants. When it rains, there is a higher chance of erosion, leaving the soil in places they should not be. UCLA had many creeks, but most of them are gone now due to invasive species and urbanization, so it is very important that we restore this creek. It was a lot of hard work removing the invasive species, but it was a rewarding experience. The Stone Canyon Creek Restoration taught me that is so easy to ruin a natural habitat, but so hard to restore it. We have to preserve natural habitats now, so we won’t have to go through all this labor and resources to restore them later.
Comment by Stephanie Wong June 7, 2009 @ 8:34 amThe restoration at Stone Canyon Creek is an example of the type of activity that should and needs to take place more often and be greatly supported by the government and all people. Habitat conservation and restoration is the field in which I plan on focusing my career; so the restoration projects that take place at Stone Canyon Creek are more than a volunteer project for me, it is like job training.
Comment by Monica Rowand June 8, 2009 @ 5:21 amOn May 30th, much progress has been made since the beginning of the project, but there remains much to be done. Included in the work remaining is the additional removal of invasive species and sifting of roots. This task is what many of the volunteers spent their time doing on Saturday. Invasive species are those that do not naturally grow in a certain environment and in many cases over power the native species that should be growing in the area.
Most people would ask why it matters what types of plants are growing in an area, “what is the difference? Green is green.” Unfortunately, this mentality is most common and the ignorance leads to the destruction of many habitats. The invasive species though are not the ones required to fill the specific niches of the particular ecosystem. In many cases, the native animals and bugs are left unfed or malnourished. The invasive species also do not have structures properly matching those of the natives. Roots are too shallow and do not provide the proper support for the soils, creating large amounts of erosion. In these cases, soil is displaced preventing further problems for the area. It is even more difficult for native species to hold their ground and the collapsing creek banks inhibit the flowing of water.
For these reasons and many other effects that occur due to invasive species and habitat destruction in other areas, conservation efforts should be given much more attention. Conservation of areas before their destruction will save restoration efforts and prevent any losses that occur during the transformation period.